Sampradayasiddha Vishaya (संप्रदायसिद्धविषयः) - Revision history

Fordharma: edited content

2021-12-20T14:52:56Z

edited content

Ckanak93 at 06:36, 20 December 2021

2021-12-20T06:36:25Z

Pṛthvī: Dr KSN video added

2019-09-17T14:02:41Z

Dr KSN video added

Fordharma: added content

2019-01-03T09:51:11Z

added content

Fordharma: added content

2019-01-03T09:32:53Z

added content

Fordharma: adding content

2019-01-03T08:13:19Z

adding content

Fordharma at 08:04, 3 January 2019

2019-01-03T08:04:14Z

Fordharma at 07:52, 3 January 2019

2019-01-03T07:52:36Z

Fordharma: Created page with "Sampradaya Siddha vishaya, now this is the especiality of our dharmic tradition, parampara system, we see that in the Wikipedia other than the traditional scholars those who d..."

2019-01-03T06:10:33Z

Created page with "Sampradaya Siddha vishaya, now this is the especiality of our dharmic tradition, parampara system, we see that in the Wikipedia other than the traditional scholars those who d..."

New page

Sampradaya Siddha vishaya, now this is the especiality of our dharmic tradition, parampara system, we see that in the Wikipedia other than the traditional scholars those who do not come from parampara system they are quoted as the reference point. They are quoted as the authorities.

Narayan acharya: This is mischievous motivated and sacrad, well obvious that the man who does not have the proper experience cannot understand the basic concepts of sanatan Dharma and therefore he must have ulterior motive in denying these things we cannot answer him from the sanatana point of you because he doesn't want to understand them, he doesn't want to understand them what you have to do is dismantle his view and questions a very idea of the attacking Hinduism, attacking basic Hindu tradition and therefore a good number of basic great Hindu scholars ignore them. I was told in one of the books of, who is that writer of Sanskrit, Rajiv Malhotra says that in sringeri he met a scholar and told him the mischief that is going on and this scholar simply said oh this goes on and therefore let us not take it seriously. Malhotra got very serious and said if you're gone ignoring these people, they will multiply. my answer is, this is not happening for the first time, this is happened over thousands of years. All through there is devas and asuras on battles, in the Vedas themselves it is recorded that a group of people called "panis" hide the Vedas them self in some caves and the great sage Angirasa set them out.

Just like a student who picks up a very important books in a library and hides it in a place so that it may not be available to other deserving students. The greater trade of Discovery is to bring that into the focus and therefore sampraday Siddha vishaya means something that is established through experience sampradaya does not mean spurious tradition, you can't have spurious tradition now and then. People like Max Mueller Wilson, these are not our sampradhaya people are our sampradhaya people are vashishtha, vamadeva, vishwamitra, jamadagni, go back to the rishis, yesterday somebody ask me a question I said as long as a myth is created by a risi it must have our lost in me. spurious myths created by these so called janpada(folk) people stories invented to decry Krishna stories invented to decry there was no mahabharata, stories invented to say that there was no such thing as Mahabharata war we don't accept that, no Hindu will accept and I am sure that this sampradhaya will endure as long as the sun and the moon are there in the sky.
[[Category:About Dharmawiki]]
[[Category:DPOV]]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 Sampradaya Siddha vishaya (Samskrit : संप्रदायसिद्धविषयः) refers to the unique dharmika tradition, the Bharatiya parampara, the sets of traditions and rites, handed down to families and lineages in Bharatavarsha. Sanatana Dharma, advocates unique concepts that have been the guiding force for the Manas (mindset) and Karma (activities) for many generations of Bharatiyas. One who does not have the proper experience due to lack of upbringing (with these concepts) in such environment cannot grasp the basic concepts of the sampradayas in Sanatana Dharma. Digressing from the benefits of such dharmika concepts due to loss and dilution of the Sampradayas has been happening over thousands of years.
-Many references in the volumes of works available in internet, accessed by many people over the world (such as Wikipedia, Institutional websites, Forums, Blogs) have been built using Books and References coming from non-traditional scholars. Such scholars (many western and bharatiya) coming from non-traditional backgrounds have all greatly contributed to the interpretations of Vedas and Vaidika Literature. Many such works, in public and media circulation, which are being questioned for their interpretations of Vaidika concepts, are being quoted as the reference points and authorities of the subject.
+Many references and citations given in the huge volume of works available on the internet, and accessed by many people over the world (such as Wikipedia, Institutional websites, Forums, Blogs) have been based on the Books and References contributed by non-traditional scholars. Such scholars (many western and bharatiya) coming from non-traditional backgrounds have given "non-sampradaya" interpretations of Vedas and Vaidika literature. Such literature has been widely publicized, debated and easily made available as popular material in media circulation. Authors of such works are subject to criticism for their "non-traditional" interpretation and extrapolations of Vaidika concepts; however, are used as main references and as authorities of the subject.
-All through the Vedas, there is mention about the Devasura sangram, where [[Deva (देवः)|Devas]] and [[Asuras (असुराः)|Asuras]] are in constant war with each other. The anecdote of the [[Panis (पणिकाः)|Panis]], who hid the Vedas in caves and Maharshi [[Angirasa (अङ्गिरसः)|Angirasa]] releasing them from captivity may be compared to that of a student who picks up very important books in a library and hides them in a place to make them unavailable to other deserving students. On the same lines at the intellectual and society level, the present day sees Patents and Intellectual property rights which are present day laws infringing on Bharatiya sampradaya siddha adhikara.
+All through the Vedas, thwe find a mention about the Devasura sangram, where [[Deva (देवः)|Devas]] and [[Asuras (असुराः)|Asuras]] are in constant war with each other. One interesting anecdote is that of the [[Panis (पणिकाः)|Panis]], who hid the Vedas in the caves. Maharshi [[Angirasa (अङ्गिरसः)|Angirasa]] with Indra's help releases them from captivity. This anecdote may be used to draw a parallel applicable in the present times. A similar situation is seen in the case of a student who picks up very important books in a library and hides them in a place to make them unavailable to other deserving students. While this is a common  student attitude seen in these competitive days, along the same lines at the intellectual and society level, are the Patents and Intellectual property rights, the laws which infringe on Bharatiya sampradaya siddha adhikara of sharing and distributing knowledge.
 {{#evu:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eu8OvIZ3AAU&feature=youtu.be
@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 |description=Sampradayasiddha Vishaya (संप्रदायसिद्धविषयः)
 }}
-Sampradayasiddha vishaya means something that is established through the experience of sampradaya; it does not refer to spurious baseless traditions. People like Max Muller, H. H. Wilson, are scholars who did not go through the rigor of Bharatiya sampradaya, hence their perspectives are different from traditional scholars. Many scholars agree that the most digressive opinions have been given in the recent colonial times more than any other period. Hence to protect the concepts the Vedas have been kept secret and given only to people who adhere to that tradition. [[Upanishads (उपनिषदः)|Upanishads]] have described vidyas which are so esoteric that if they fall into the hands of undeserving people it will bring about very undesirable effects on the mankind, hence they are called Rahasya (secret). It was the rigor and commitment of the Maharshis that has kept the [[Vedapatha Paddhati (वेदपाठपद्धतिः)|Vedapatha paddhi]] alive since ages. It is this focus on the Sampradayasiddha vishayas which is lacking in the present day society, which Dharmawiki aims to revive. Lets bring back our tradition lets reclaim our adhikara! Lets us bow in respect to people like Shri. Abhijeet Dinkar Savale of Trayamabakeshwar about whom Indiafacts author Shri. Surendra Chandra mentions the following with reverence.<ref>http://indiafacts.org/after-millenia-tradition-reborn-vaidika-bharata/</ref> <blockquote>''Abhijeet’s hereditary shaakha was the Rig Veda, but he was forced to undergo basic training in the Madhyandina Shaakha of the Shukla Yajur Veda instead. Despite his family’s straitened circumstances, Abhijeet volunteered to spend years in learning the Rig Veda, in order to carry forward the legacy bequeathed to him.''</blockquote>Existence of Gotras (lineages) and Svadhyaya (as in Brahmayajna which is one of the [[Panchamahayajnas (पञ्चमहायज्ञाः)|Panchamahayajnas]]) of the Vedas is an important concept that relied heavily on sampradaya. Svadhyaya refers to the study of a particular shakha of the Veda by the persons belonging to that shakha. This ensured the continuity of the Veda shakha. In older days, a person born in the community belonging to Rig veda shakhas, studied only that Veda shakha; he would not be studying Yajurveda. This ensured that the Rigveda shakha continued through the generations from father to son. The same concept evolved for the development of gotras.<ref>Personal Communication of Dr. K. S. Narayanacharya </ref>
+Sampradayasiddha vishaya means something that is established through the experience of sampradaya; it does not refer to spurious baseless traditions. People like Max Muller, H. H. Wilson, are scholars who did not go through the rigor of Bharatiya sampradaya, hence their perspectives are different from traditional scholars. Many scholars agree that the most digressive opinions have been given in the recent colonial times more than any other period. Hence to protect the esoteric concepts, the Vedas have been kept secret and their knowledge was transmitted only to people who adhered to that tradition.
 == Reference ==
 [[Category:About Dharmawiki]]
 [[Category:DPOV]]

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 |description=Sampradayasiddha Vishaya (संप्रदायसिद्धविषयः)
 }}
-Sampradayasiddha vishaya means something that is established through the experience of sampradaya; it does not refer to spurious baseless traditions. People like Max Muller, H. H. Wilson, are scholars who did not go through the rigor of Bharatiya sampradaya, hence their perspectives are different from traditional scholars. Many scholars agree that the most digressive opinions have been given in the recent colonial times more than any other period. Hence to protect the concepts the Vedas have been kept secret and given only to people who adhere to that tradition. [[Upanishads (उपनिषदः)|Upanishads]] have describe vidyas which are so esoteric that if they fall into the hands of undeserving people will bring about very undesirable effects on the mankind, hence they are called Rahasya (secret). It was the rigor and commitment of the Maharshis that has kept the [[Vedapatha Paddhati (वेदपाठपद्धतिः)|Vedapatha paddhi]] alive since ages. It is this focus on the Sampradayasiddha vishayas which is lacking in the present day society, which Dharmawiki aims to revive. Lets bring back out tradition lets reclaim our adhikara! Lets us bow in respect to people like Shri. Abhijeet Dinkar Savale of Trayamabakeshwar about whom Indiafacts author Shri. Surendra Chandra mentions the following with reverence.<ref>http://indiafacts.org/after-millenia-tradition-reborn-vaidika-bharata/</ref> <blockquote>''Abhijeet’s hereditary shaakha was the Rig Veda, but he was forced to undergo basic training in the Madhyandina Shaakha of the Shukla Yajur Veda instead. Despite his family’s straitened circumstances, Abhijeet volunteered to spend years in learning the Rig Veda, in order to carry forward the legacy bequeathed to him.''</blockquote>Existence of Gotras (lineages) and Svadhyaya (as in Brahmayajna which is one of the [[Panchamahayajnas (पञ्चमहायज्ञाः)|Panchamahayajnas]]) of the Vedas is an important concept that relied heavily on sampradaya. Svadhyaya refers to the study of a particular shaka of the Veda by the persons belonging to that shaka. This ensured the continuity of the Veda shaka. In older days, a person born in the community belonging to Rig veda shakas, studied only that Veda shaka; he would not be studying Yajurveda. This ensured that the Rigveda shaka continued through the generations from father to son. The same concept evolved for the development of gotras.<ref>Personal Communication of Dr. K. S. Narayanacharya </ref>
+Sampradayasiddha vishaya means something that is established through the experience of sampradaya; it does not refer to spurious baseless traditions. People like Max Muller, H. H. Wilson, are scholars who did not go through the rigor of Bharatiya sampradaya, hence their perspectives are different from traditional scholars. Many scholars agree that the most digressive opinions have been given in the recent colonial times more than any other period. Hence to protect the concepts the Vedas have been kept secret and given only to people who adhere to that tradition. [[Upanishads (उपनिषदः)|Upanishads]] have described vidyas which are so esoteric that if they fall into the hands of undeserving people it will bring about very undesirable effects on the mankind, hence they are called Rahasya (secret). It was the rigor and commitment of the Maharshis that has kept the [[Vedapatha Paddhati (वेदपाठपद्धतिः)|Vedapatha paddhi]] alive since ages. It is this focus on the Sampradayasiddha vishayas which is lacking in the present day society, which Dharmawiki aims to revive. Lets bring back our tradition lets reclaim our adhikara! Lets us bow in respect to people like Shri. Abhijeet Dinkar Savale of Trayamabakeshwar about whom Indiafacts author Shri. Surendra Chandra mentions the following with reverence.<ref>http://indiafacts.org/after-millenia-tradition-reborn-vaidika-bharata/</ref> <blockquote>''Abhijeet’s hereditary shaakha was the Rig Veda, but he was forced to undergo basic training in the Madhyandina Shaakha of the Shukla Yajur Veda instead. Despite his family’s straitened circumstances, Abhijeet volunteered to spend years in learning the Rig Veda, in order to carry forward the legacy bequeathed to him.''</blockquote>Existence of Gotras (lineages) and Svadhyaya (as in Brahmayajna which is one of the [[Panchamahayajnas (पञ्चमहायज्ञाः)|Panchamahayajnas]]) of the Vedas is an important concept that relied heavily on sampradaya. Svadhyaya refers to the study of a particular shakha of the Veda by the persons belonging to that shakha. This ensured the continuity of the Veda shakha. In older days, a person born in the community belonging to Rig veda shakhas, studied only that Veda shakha; he would not be studying Yajurveda. This ensured that the Rigveda shakha continued through the generations from father to son. The same concept evolved for the development of gotras.<ref>Personal Communication of Dr. K. S. Narayanacharya </ref>
 == Reference ==
 [[Category:About Dharmawiki]]
 [[Category:DPOV]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:02, 17 September 2019
Line 5:		Line 5:
	All through the Vedas, there is mention about the Devasura sangram, where [[Deva (देवः)\|Devas]] and [[Asuras (असुराः)\|Asuras]] are in constant war with each other. The anecdote of the [[Panis (पणिकाः)\|Panis]], who hid the Vedas in caves and Maharshi [[Angirasa (अङ्गिरसः)\|Angirasa]] releasing them from captivity may be compared to that of a student who picks up very important books in a library and hides them in a place to make them unavailable to other deserving students. On the same lines at the intellectual and society level, the present day sees Patents and Intellectual property rights which are present day laws infringing on Bharatiya sampradaya siddha adhikara.		All through the Vedas, there is mention about the Devasura sangram, where [[Deva (देवः)\|Devas]] and [[Asuras (असुराः)\|Asuras]] are in constant war with each other. The anecdote of the [[Panis (पणिकाः)\|Panis]], who hid the Vedas in caves and Maharshi [[Angirasa (अङ्गिरसः)\|Angirasa]] releasing them from captivity may be compared to that of a student who picks up very important books in a library and hides them in a place to make them unavailable to other deserving students. On the same lines at the intellectual and society level, the present day sees Patents and Intellectual property rights which are present day laws infringing on Bharatiya sampradaya siddha adhikara.

		+	{{#evu:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eu8OvIZ3AAU&feature=youtu.be
		+	\|alignment=right
		+	\|dimensions=500x248
		+	\|container=frame
		+	\|description=Sampradayasiddha Vishaya (संप्रदायसिद्धविषयः)
		+	}}
	Sampradayasiddha vishaya means something that is established through the experience of sampradaya; it does not refer to spurious baseless traditions. People like Max Muller, H. H. Wilson, are scholars who did not go through the rigor of Bharatiya sampradaya, hence their perspectives are different from traditional scholars. Many scholars agree that the most digressive opinions have been given in the recent colonial times more than any other period. Hence to protect the concepts the Vedas have been kept secret and given only to people who adhere to that tradition. [[Upanishads (उपनिषदः)\|Upanishads]] have describe vidyas which are so esoteric that if they fall into the hands of undeserving people will bring about very undesirable effects on the mankind, hence they are called Rahasya (secret). It was the rigor and commitment of the Maharshis that has kept the [[Vedapatha Paddhati (वेदपाठपद्धतिः)\|Vedapatha paddhi]] alive since ages. It is this focus on the Sampradayasiddha vishayas which is lacking in the present day society, which Dharmawiki aims to revive. Lets bring back out tradition lets reclaim our adhikara! Lets us bow in respect to people like Shri. Abhijeet Dinkar Savale of Trayamabakeshwar about whom Indiafacts author Shri. Surendra Chandra mentions the following with reverence.<ref>http://indiafacts.org/after-millenia-tradition-reborn-vaidika-bharata/</ref> <blockquote>''Abhijeet’s hereditary shaakha was the Rig Veda, but he was forced to undergo basic training in the Madhyandina Shaakha of the Shukla Yajur Veda instead. Despite his family’s straitened circumstances, Abhijeet volunteered to spend years in learning the Rig Veda, in order to carry forward the legacy bequeathed to him.''</blockquote>Existence of Gotras (lineages) and Svadhyaya (as in Brahmayajna which is one of the [[Panchamahayajnas (पञ्चमहायज्ञाः)\|Panchamahayajnas]]) of the Vedas is an important concept that relied heavily on sampradaya. Svadhyaya refers to the study of a particular shaka of the Veda by the persons belonging to that shaka. This ensured the continuity of the Veda shaka. In older days, a person born in the community belonging to Rig veda shakas, studied only that Veda shaka; he would not be studying Yajurveda. This ensured that the Rigveda shaka continued through the generations from father to son. The same concept evolved for the development of gotras.<ref>Personal Communication of Dr. K. S. Narayanacharya </ref>		Sampradayasiddha vishaya means something that is established through the experience of sampradaya; it does not refer to spurious baseless traditions. People like Max Muller, H. H. Wilson, are scholars who did not go through the rigor of Bharatiya sampradaya, hence their perspectives are different from traditional scholars. Many scholars agree that the most digressive opinions have been given in the recent colonial times more than any other period. Hence to protect the concepts the Vedas have been kept secret and given only to people who adhere to that tradition. [[Upanishads (उपनिषदः)\|Upanishads]] have describe vidyas which are so esoteric that if they fall into the hands of undeserving people will bring about very undesirable effects on the mankind, hence they are called Rahasya (secret). It was the rigor and commitment of the Maharshis that has kept the [[Vedapatha Paddhati (वेदपाठपद्धतिः)\|Vedapatha paddhi]] alive since ages. It is this focus on the Sampradayasiddha vishayas which is lacking in the present day society, which Dharmawiki aims to revive. Lets bring back out tradition lets reclaim our adhikara! Lets us bow in respect to people like Shri. Abhijeet Dinkar Savale of Trayamabakeshwar about whom Indiafacts author Shri. Surendra Chandra mentions the following with reverence.<ref>http://indiafacts.org/after-millenia-tradition-reborn-vaidika-bharata/</ref> <blockquote>''Abhijeet’s hereditary shaakha was the Rig Veda, but he was forced to undergo basic training in the Madhyandina Shaakha of the Shukla Yajur Veda instead. Despite his family’s straitened circumstances, Abhijeet volunteered to spend years in learning the Rig Veda, in order to carry forward the legacy bequeathed to him.''</blockquote>Existence of Gotras (lineages) and Svadhyaya (as in Brahmayajna which is one of the [[Panchamahayajnas (पञ्चमहायज्ञाः)\|Panchamahayajnas]]) of the Vedas is an important concept that relied heavily on sampradaya. Svadhyaya refers to the study of a particular shaka of the Veda by the persons belonging to that shaka. This ensured the continuity of the Veda shaka. In older days, a person born in the community belonging to Rig veda shakas, studied only that Veda shaka; he would not be studying Yajurveda. This ensured that the Rigveda shaka continued through the generations from father to son. The same concept evolved for the development of gotras.<ref>Personal Communication of Dr. K. S. Narayanacharya </ref>

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-Sampradaya Siddha vishaya (Samskrit : संप्रदायसिद्धविषयः) refers to the unique dharmika tradition, the Bharatiya parampara that has been in handed down to families and lineages in Bharatavarsha. Many references in the volumes of works available in internet, accessed by many people over the world (such as Wikipedia, Institutional websites, Forums, Blogs) have been built using Books and References coming from non-traditional scholars. Such scholars (many western and bharatiya) coming from non-traditional backgrounds have all greatly contributed to the interpretations of Vedas and Vaidika Literature. Many such works, in public and media circulation, which are being questioned for their interpretations of Vaidika concepts, are being quoted as the reference points and authorities of the subject.
+Sampradaya Siddha vishaya (Samskrit : संप्रदायसिद्धविषयः) refers to the unique dharmika tradition, the Bharatiya parampara, the sets of traditions and rites, handed down to families and lineages in Bharatavarsha. Sanatana Dharma, advocates unique concepts that have been the guiding force for the Manas (mindset) and Karma (activities) for many generations of Bharatiyas. One who does not have the proper experience due to lack of upbringing (with these concepts) in such environment cannot grasp the basic concepts of the sampradayas in Sanatana Dharma. Digressing from the benefits of such dharmika concepts due to loss and dilution of the Sampradayas has been happening over thousands of years.
-Sanatana Dharma, advocates unique concepts that have been the guiding force for the Manas (mindset) and Karma (activities) for many generations of Bharatiyas. One who does not have the proper experience due to lack of upbringing (with these concepts) in such environment cannot grasp the basic concepts of the sampradayas in Sanatana Dharma. Digressing from the benefits of dharmika concepts has been happening over thousands of years.
+Many references in the volumes of works available in internet, accessed by many people over the world (such as Wikipedia, Institutional websites, Forums, Blogs) have been built using Books and References coming from non-traditional scholars. Such scholars (many western and bharatiya) coming from non-traditional backgrounds have all greatly contributed to the interpretations of Vedas and Vaidika Literature. Many such works, in public and media circulation, which are being questioned for their interpretations of Vaidika concepts, are being quoted as the reference points and authorities of the subject.
 All through the Vedas, there is mention about the Devasura sangram, where [[Deva (देवः)|Devas]] and [[Asuras (असुराः)|Asuras]] are in constant war with each other. The anecdote of the [[Panis (पणिकाः)|Panis]], who hid the Vedas in caves and Maharshi [[Angirasa (अङ्गिरसः)|Angirasa]] releasing them from captivity may be compared to that of a student who picks up very important books in a library and hides them in a place to make them unavailable to other deserving students. On the same lines at the intellectual and society level, the present day sees Patents and Intellectual property rights which are present day laws infringing on Bharatiya sampradaya siddha adhikara.
-Sampradayasiddha vishaya means something that is established through the experience of sampradaya; it does not refer to spurious baseless traditions. People like Max Muller, H. H. Wilson, are scholars who did not go through the rigor of Bharatiya sampradhaya, hence their perspectives are different from traditional scholars. Many scholars agree that the most digressive opinions have been given in the recent colonial times more than any other period. Hence to protect the concepts the Vedas have been kept secret and given only to people who adhere to that tradition. Upanishads have describe vidyas which are so esoteric that if they fall into the hands of undeserving people will bring about very undesirable effects on the mankind. It was the rigor and commitment of the Maharshis that has kept the [[Vedapatha Paddhati (वेदपाठपद्धतिः)|Vedapatha paddhi]] alive since ages. It is this focus on the Sampradayasiddha vishayas which is lacking in the present day society, which Dharmawiki aims to revive.
+Sampradayasiddha vishaya means something that is established through the experience of sampradaya; it does not refer to spurious baseless traditions. People like Max Muller, H. H. Wilson, are scholars who did not go through the rigor of Bharatiya sampradaya, hence their perspectives are different from traditional scholars. Many scholars agree that the most digressive opinions have been given in the recent colonial times more than any other period. Hence to protect the concepts the Vedas have been kept secret and given only to people who adhere to that tradition. [[Upanishads (उपनिषदः)|Upanishads]] have describe vidyas which are so esoteric that if they fall into the hands of undeserving people will bring about very undesirable effects on the mankind, hence they are called Rahasya (secret). It was the rigor and commitment of the Maharshis that has kept the [[Vedapatha Paddhati (वेदपाठपद्धतिः)|Vedapatha paddhi]] alive since ages. It is this focus on the Sampradayasiddha vishayas which is lacking in the present day society, which Dharmawiki aims to revive. Lets bring back out tradition lets reclaim our adhikara! Lets us bow in respect to people like Shri. Abhijeet Dinkar Savale of Trayamabakeshwar about whom Indiafacts author Shri. Surendra Chandra mentions the following with reverence.<ref>http://indiafacts.org/after-millenia-tradition-reborn-vaidika-bharata/</ref> <blockquote>''Abhijeet’s hereditary shaakha was the Rig Veda, but he was forced to undergo basic training in the Madhyandina Shaakha of the Shukla Yajur Veda instead. Despite his family’s straitened circumstances, Abhijeet volunteered to spend years in learning the Rig Veda, in order to carry forward the legacy bequeathed to him.''</blockquote>Existence of Gotras (lineages) and Svadhyaya (as in Brahmayajna which is one of the [[Panchamahayajnas (पञ्चमहायज्ञाः)|Panchamahayajnas]]) of the Vedas is an important concept that relied heavily on sampradaya. Svadhyaya refers to the study of a particular shaka of the Veda by the persons belonging to that shaka. This ensured the continuity of the Veda shaka. In older days, a person born in the community belonging to Rig veda shakas, studied only that Veda shaka; he would not be studying Yajurveda. This ensured that the Rigveda shaka continued through the generations from father to son. The same concept evolved for the development of gotras.<ref>Personal Communication of Dr. K. S. Narayanacharya </ref>
 == Reference ==
 [[Category:About Dharmawiki]]
 [[Category:DPOV]]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 Sampradaya Siddha vishaya (Samskrit : संप्रदायसिद्धविषयः) refers to the unique dharmika tradition, the Bharatiya parampara that has been in handed down to families and lineages in Bharatavarsha. Many references in the volumes of works available in internet, accessed by many people over the world (such as Wikipedia, Institutional websites, Forums, Blogs) have been built using Books and References coming from non-traditional scholars. Such scholars (many western and bharatiya) coming from non-traditional backgrounds have all greatly contributed to the interpretations of Vedas and Vaidika Literature. Many such works, in public and media circulation, which are being questioned for their interpretations of Vaidika concepts, are being quoted as the reference points and authorities of the subject.
-Sanatana Dharma, advocates unique concepts that have been the guiding force for the Manas (mindset) and Karma (activities) for many generations of Bharatiyas. One who does not have the proper experience due to lack of upbringing (with these concepts) in such social environment cannot grasp the basic concepts of the sampradayas in Sanatana Dharma. Digressing from the benefits of dharmika concepts has been happening over thousands of years.
+Sanatana Dharma, advocates unique concepts that have been the guiding force for the Manas (mindset) and Karma (activities) for many generations of Bharatiyas. One who does not have the proper experience due to lack of upbringing (with these concepts) in such environment cannot grasp the basic concepts of the sampradayas in Sanatana Dharma. Digressing from the benefits of dharmika concepts has been happening over thousands of years.
-All through the Vedas, there is mention about the Devasura sangram, where [[Deva (देवः)|Devas]] and [[Asuras (असुराः)|Asuras]] are in constant war with each other. The anecdote of the [[Panis (पणिकाः)|Panis]], who hid the Vedas in caves and Maharshi [[Angirasa (अङ्गिरसः)|Angirasa]] releasing them from captivity may be compared to that of a student who picks up very important books in a library and hides them in a place to make them unavailable to other deserving students. On the intellectual and society level, the present day sees Patents and Intellectual property rights,  to the stealing of Vedas by Panis.
+All through the Vedas, there is mention about the Devasura sangram, where [[Deva (देवः)|Devas]] and [[Asuras (असुराः)|Asuras]] are in constant war with each other. The anecdote of the [[Panis (पणिकाः)|Panis]], who hid the Vedas in caves and Maharshi [[Angirasa (अङ्गिरसः)|Angirasa]] releasing them from captivity may be compared to that of a student who picks up very important books in a library and hides them in a place to make them unavailable to other deserving students. On the same lines at the intellectual and society level, the present day sees Patents and Intellectual property rights which are present day laws infringing on Bharatiya sampradaya siddha adhikara.
-The greater trade of Discovery is to bring that into the focus and therefore sampraday Siddha vishaya means something that is established through experience sampradaya does not mean spurious tradition, you can't have spurious tradition now and then. People like Max Mueller Wilson, these are not our sampradhaya people are our sampradhaya people are vashishtha, vamadeva, vishwamitra, jamadagni, go back to the rishis, yesterday somebody ask me a question I said as long as a myth is created by a risi it must have our lost in me. spurious myths created by these so called janpada(folk) people stories invented to decry Krishna stories invented to decry there was no mahabharata, stories invented to say that there was no such thing as Mahabharata war we don't accept that, no Hindu will accept and I am sure that this sampradhaya will endure as long as the sun and the moon are there in the sky.
+Sampradayasiddha vishaya means something that is established through the experience of sampradaya; it does not refer to spurious baseless traditions. People like Max Muller, H. H. Wilson, are scholars who did not go through the rigor of Bharatiya sampradhaya, hence their perspectives are different from traditional scholars. Many scholars agree that the most digressive opinions have been given in the recent colonial times more than any other period. Hence to protect the concepts the Vedas have been kept secret and given only to people who adhere to that tradition. Upanishads have describe vidyas which are so esoteric that if they fall into the hands of undeserving people will bring about very undesirable effects on the mankind. It was the rigor and commitment of the Maharshis that has kept the [[Vedapatha Paddhati (वेदपाठपद्धतिः)|Vedapatha paddhi]] alive since ages. It is this focus on the Sampradayasiddha vishayas which is lacking in the present day society, which Dharmawiki aims to revive.
 [[Category:About Dharmawiki]]
 [[Category:DPOV]]